Skip to content
R&D Tax Academy
Contact us

Module 3: Advanced calculations

The calculation structure that holds in every scheme, the decision points where rates, caps, elections, contracted and overseas work, grants and group questions change the result, and a worked example in two countries.

Advisor and Practitioner ProgramLast reviewed 2 October 2026

After this module you will be able to build a claim calculation that is structured the same way in every country, identify each point where a rule, a cap or an election changes the result, and record the decision taken at each point so it can be defended later by someone who did not prepare it.

What this module covers

  • A six step calculation structure: cost base, category rules, grants and funding, rate or method, limits, and the form of the benefit.
  • Subcontracted and overseas work: the percentage rules and the location rules, country by country.
  • A worked example with register rates for the United Kingdom and Ireland.

The calculation structure

Six steps, in order:

  1. Cost base. Start from the boundary drawn in Module 2. Collect costs by category and reconcile each to the ledger.
  2. Category rules. Apply the rule for each category: the staff proportion supported by time records, the percentage of contracted payments admitted, location conditions and connected party treatment.
  3. Grants and funding. Reduce the base, or note that the scheme does not, for grants, subsidies, contract payments and other assistance.
  4. Rate or method. Apply the rate, or where the scheme offers a choice of method, compute every option on the same base and choose with a written reason.
  5. Limits. Apply expenditure caps, the thresholds that decide which rate applies, and caps on payable amounts.
  6. Form of the benefit. Determine whether the result reduces tax, is paid out, is carried forward or is split across instalments.

Elections and method choices

A reviewer reads the file to see whether each election was taken deliberately. Compute each option on the same cost schedule, so the comparison is of methods, not data. Record the decision, the reason, the date and the approver, and whether the election is irrevocable for the year.

Subcontracted and overseas work

CountryContracted work: amount admittedLocation rule
United StatesContract research: 65% of amounts paid for qualified research performed for youContract research expenses qualify only to the extent the research is conducted within the United States
United Kingdom65 percent of payments to an unconnected subcontractor for contracted out R&D qualify; connected party payments are limited to the subcontractor's relevant expenditureFor accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2024, relief for contracted out R&D and externally provided workers is generally limited to work carried out in the UK
IrelandExpenditure on R&D activities carried on by an unconnected person on behalf of the company qualifies up to the greater of 15 percent of the company's own qualifying expenditure and €100,000, provided the person does not also claimExpenditure qualifies where the R&D activities are carried on within the State or another EEA state, and the expenditure is not relieved against tax in another territory
CanadaOnly 80 percent of arm's length contract payments and third-party payments for SR&ED are included in qualified expendituresSalary or wages for SR&ED carried on outside Canada by employees resident in Canada can be included to the extent they do not exceed 10 percent of the total salary or wages for SR&ED carried on in Canada in the year
AustraliaNot eligible where the R&D activities are conducted to a significant extent for another entity, or where another entity bears the financial risk and effectively owns the resultsR&D activities conducted outside Australia are eligible only where covered by a finding under section 28C of the Industry Research and Development Act 1986
New ZealandExpenditure on a contractor performing R&D on behalf of the claimant is eligible for the claimant; the contractor cannot claim for the same activitiesEligible expenditure on R&D performed outside New Zealand is limited to 10 percent of the total eligible expenditure for the year
SingaporeFor R&D outsourced to an R&D organisation in Singapore, IRAS treats a fixed portion of the fee (60 percent) as qualifying staff costs and consumablesExpenditure on R&D undertaken outside Singapore is deductible at 100 percent under section 14C where the R&D is related to the trade, and does not qualify for the additional deductions under section 14D

Grants, groups and cross-border questions

Grants and other funding. In the United Kingdom, for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2024 there is no restriction for subsidised or grant-funded expenditure. In Ireland, expenditure met directly or indirectly by grant assistance or any other assistance from the State, an EU institution or any other state is not qualifying expenditure. In Canada, qualified expenditures are reduced by government assistance, non-government assistance and contract payments. In Singapore, R&D expenditure met by a government grant or subsidy is not deductible to the extent of the grant. In the United States research is funded if payment is not contingent on the success of the research, or if the taxpayer does not retain substantial rights, and only to the extent of the funding.

Groups. Members of a controlled group in the United States are treated as a single taxpayer for the credit, with the group credit allocated among members in proportion to each member's share of the eligible expenses. Associated Canadian-controlled private corporations must allocate a single expenditure limit among themselves. In Australia aggregated turnover includes the annual turnover of connected entities and affiliates, including foreign entities. In the United Kingdom the R&D intensity ratio is measured across the company and its connected companies.

Cross-border arrangements. Where a client has teams in two countries, three questions decide the calculation in each: where the work was physically performed, which entity bore the cost and bears the risk, and which entity owns the results.

Illustrative example

Illustrative example. Harbour Robotics Ltd, a hypothetical company, has eligible costs of 100,000 inside the boundary for its gripping algorithm project: 80,000 of staff costs and 20,000 paid to an unconnected subcontractor that performed testing in the same country, with no grant funding.

In the United Kingdom, 65 percent of the payment to the unconnected subcontractor qualifies, so 13,000 enters the base and the base is 93,000. The United Kingdom gives a 20% expenditure credit, 18,600, and the credit is taxable: notional tax at the main rate of 25% is deducted for a company paying the main rate, giving a net benefit of 15% of the base, 13,950. For a loss-making company notional tax is deducted at the small profits rate of 19%, giving a net benefit of 16.2%, 15,066.

In Ireland, the subcontractor payment qualifies up to the greater of 15 percent of the company's own qualifying expenditure, 12,000, and €100,000, so the whole 20,000 enters the base, provided the subcontractor is notified in writing and does not also claim. The base is 100,000 and the credit at the 30% rate for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2024 is 30,000. The first instalment is the greater of €75,000 and 50 percent of the credit; where the credit does not exceed the threshold, the whole credit is paid as a single instalment, and the company elects whether it is offset against tax or repaid.

Across the seven countries

CountryMain election or method choice
United StatesChoose a method: regular credit or alternative simplified credit, and decide whether to elect the reduced credit under section 280C(c).
United KingdomMost companies claim under the merged scheme; loss-making SMEs that are R&D intensive can claim ERIS instead, and an R&D intensive SME may elect to claim under the merged scheme rather than ERIS.
IrelandThe credit is paid in three annual instalments, as an offset against tax or a repayment. The company elects whether each instalment is offset or repaid.
CanadaThe proxy method substitutes a prescribed proxy amount of 55 percent of the salary base for actual overheads. The election to use the proxy method is made on Form T661 and, once made, is irrevocable for that tax year.
AustraliaExpenditure incurred to an associate can be notionally deducted only in the income year in which it is paid; if unpaid at year end the entity may claim it when paid, or deduct it under ordinary provisions and forgo the offset.
New ZealandA person may apply for criteria and methodologies approval where eligible R&D expenditure for the income year is expected to exceed NZ$2 million; a significant performer may choose to apply for general approval of its activities instead.
SingaporeCash payout: optional. 20% of up to S$100,000 of qualifying expenditure across EIS activities, so up to S$20,000 per Year of Assessment. An approved cash payout election is irrevocable and the converted expenditure cannot subsequently be claimed as a deduction.

Where to go next

Self-check questions

Answer each question, then open it to compare.

Name the six steps of the calculation structure in order, and say which step the headline rate belongs to.
Establish the eligible cost base inside the boundary; apply the category rules such as contracted work percentages and location limits; adjust for grants, funding and other assistance; apply the rate or chosen method; apply the limits and caps; determine the form and timing of the benefit. The headline rate is step four, and a figure quoted before steps one to three are done is not a calculation.
A client has an election available that is irrevocable for the year once made. What goes in the file before it is made?
A comparison of the outcomes under each option on the same cost schedule, the inputs each option depends on and how well each can be substantiated, the decision and the reason for it, and the date and the person who approved it. The comparison is kept because the choice may be questioned in a later year.
In the worked example, why is the United Kingdom credit of 18,600 worth 13,950 to Harbour Robotics, while Ireland's credit of 30,000 is worth 30,000?
The United Kingdom expenditure credit is taxable, and notional tax at the main rate of 25% is deducted, giving a net benefit of 15% of the base. The Irish credit is a credit against corporation tax that is paid out in instalments and is not reduced in that way.
A client paid 20,000 to an unconnected subcontractor. Give two reasons the amount that enters the base can differ between countries.
Several schemes admit only a fixed percentage of contracted work (65% in the United States and the United Kingdom, 80% of arm's length payments in Canada), while Ireland applies a limit of the greater of 15% of the company's own qualifying expenditure and 100,000 euro. Separately, where the work was performed matters: the United Kingdom generally limits relief for contracted out R&D to work carried out in the UK, and the United States admits contract research only to the extent it is conducted within the United States.
Why does a group structure have to be examined before the rate is applied?
Because several schemes measure thresholds and limits across connected or associated entities. In the United States members of a controlled group are treated as a single taxpayer for the credit; in Canada associated Canadian-controlled private corporations allocate a single expenditure limit; in Australia aggregated turnover includes connected entities and affiliates; in the United Kingdom the intensity ratio is measured across the company and its connected companies.

Official sources

Register interest in Advisor and Practitioner Program

Tell us where you claim and we will let you know when this program opens for your country.

Register interest

Educational content only, not tax advice. See the disclaimer.