Skip to content
R&D Tax Academy
Contact us

Module 4: The claim lifecycle

Identifying candidate projects, gathering evidence, building the numbers, filing, and responding to questions from the tax authority. Who inside the company owns each step.

R&D Tax FundamentalsLast reviewed 2 October 2026

After this module you will be able to describe a claim as seven stages with an output and an owner for each, explain why the finance team cannot run it alone, place the registration, notification or approval steps that some countries require before the claim, and know what happens after the return is filed.

What this module covers

  • The seven stages of a claim and what each one produces.
  • Who inside the company owns each stage, and where an advisor fits.
  • The registration, notification or approval steps that come before the claim in some countries.
  • What happens after filing: processing, selection for review and questions.

The seven stages

StageOutputOwnerAlso involved
1. Identify candidate projectsA list of projects, each with a one sentence statement of the uncertaintyTechnical leadFinance convenes and keeps the list
2. Test each project against the definitionIncluded or excluded, with the reason written downTechnical leadFinance challenges; advisor advises
3. Gather the evidenceRecords made at the time, linked to each included project (module 5)Technical leadEveryone who worked on the project
4. Build the numbersA cost schedule by project and category, each line tied to a record (module 3)FinancePayroll, purchasing, project managers
5. Write the narrativePer project: the uncertainty, the work done, the outcomeTechnical leadFinance edits for consistency with the numbers
6. Complete any step before the claim, then fileRegistration, notification or approval where required; the claim in or alongside the returnFinance or taxDirector signs off; advisor prepares forms
7. Respond to questions and keep the recordsTimely, factual answers; records retained for the country's periodNamed owner, agreed before filingTechnical lead for technical questions, finance for costs

Three things stand out. The technical lead owns the first three stages and writes the fifth. The written reason for excluding a project is evidence that the company applied the definition rather than claiming everything. And stage 7 has an owner before the claim is filed, because questions can arrive long after the people involved have moved on.

Who owns what

The director or finance lead who signs is accountable for the claim being correct. They should see the project list with its exclusions, the cost schedule and the narratives before anything is filed. The guide on why claim integrity matters explains what is at stake.

Finance coordinates: the calendar, the cost schedule, the forms, and the consistency between words and numbers. Finance does not decide whether a project qualifies.

The technical lead decides which projects involve a scientific or technological uncertainty, draws the start and end of each, describes the work in their own words and stands behind it if questions come. Tax authorities expect the description to come from the people who did the work.

An advisor, where one is used, can test the eligibility decisions, prepare the forms and manage the process, but cannot replace the technical judgement or the company's own records.

Before the claim: registration, notification and approval

This step falls on a different date from the return and, in some countries, cannot be made good afterwards. Three patterns cover the seven.

  1. No step. The claim is made with the return. The United States, Canada and Singapore work this way, although Canada offers optional pre-claim approval.
  2. Notification for new or returning claimants. A company claiming for the first time, or after a gap of several years, tells the tax authority in advance that a claim is coming. The United Kingdom and Ireland use this pattern, each with its own deadline, and a claim made without the required notification is not valid.
  3. Registration or approval every year. The activities are registered or approved for each income year before the benefit is claimed in the return. Australia and New Zealand use this pattern. Without it the expenditure cannot be claimed.

Find the step for your country on the day the project list is made, and put its deadline in the calendar first.

After filing

Once the return is in, the tax authority processes it and either accepts the claim or selects it for review. Most of the seven authorities say they select claims on a risk basis, using the information in the claim, the company's history and the sector. A review is a request for information with a deadline, and in several countries the authority may consult an outside technical expert on whether the work meets the definition.

What reviewers test is consistent across countries: whether the narrative matches the financial records, how the staff time allocations were made and what supports them, and whether the records were made at the time rather than written for the review. The company's job is to answer factually, within the time allowed, from the records it already holds. Outcomes range from acceptance, through a reduced claim, to repayment of the benefit with interest and, where the claim was careless or worse, a penalty. Review tests every earlier stage, which is why module 5 asks for the evidence to be built during the year.

Illustrative example

Illustrative example. Harbour Robotics Ltd, a hypothetical company, has a 31 December year end. In the first week of January the finance manager and the engineering lead list five candidate projects. Two are excluded in writing: the operator app, because it used known methods, and the customer study, because market research is excluded; three go forward, including the gripper. In February finance builds the cost schedule from time records and purchase codes, arriving at 95,000 across the three projects before the country's rules are applied. In March the engineering lead drafts the narratives and finance checks that every name in them appears in the time records. The finance director reviews the list, the exclusions and the schedule, and signs. Finance has already checked whether the company's country requires a registration, notification or approval before the claim and has put that date in the calendar; the claim is then filed with the return. Months later the tax authority asks for the time records and test logs behind the gripper project. The engineering lead, named as owner in March, sends the existing records within the deadline. Nothing is written for the review that was not already on file.

Across the seven countries

CountryBefore the claimHow and when the claim is made
United StatesNo pre-registrationForm 6765, filed with the income tax return
United KingdomClaim notification if you are claiming for the first time or your last claim was more than 3 years ago, within 6 months of the end of the period of account. An additional information form with every claimAn R&D claim must be made, amended or withdrawn within 2 years of the end of the accounting period it relates to. The claim is made in the Company Tax Return
IrelandCompanies claiming for the first time, or that have not claimed in the previous 3 years, must notify Revenue in advance, at least 90 days before the claim, using a prescribed formWithin 12 months of the end of the accounting period in which the expenditure was incurred. The claim is made on the corporation tax return
CanadaNo registration. Optional pre-claim approval has been available since 1 April 2026Form T661 with Schedule 31 for corporations, filed with the income tax return and no later than 12 months after its filing due date
AustraliaRegister R&D activities with the department within 10 months of the end of the income yearClaim the offset in the company tax return by completing the R&D tax incentive schedule
New ZealandGeneral approval, or criteria and methodologies approval, for the income year. Apply for general approval by the last day of the 3rd month after the end of the income yearSupplementary return within 30 days after the income tax return due date, or the extension of time due date. File the income tax return for the year first
SingaporeNo registrationClaim the enhanced deduction in the corporate income tax return by its filing due date. Apply for any cash payout after filing the return and before the filing due date

Where to go next

Self-check questions

Answer each question, then open it to compare.

List the seven stages of a claim in order.
Identify candidate projects; test each against the definition and record the decision; gather the evidence; build the numbers; write the narrative; complete any registration, notification or approval step and file; respond to questions and keep the records. The first two are technical judgements, the fourth is finance, and the rest are shared.
Why can the finance team not run a claim alone?
Two of the stages, deciding whether a project involves a scientific or technological uncertainty and describing the work done to resolve it, are technical judgements that the tax authority expects to come from the people who did the work. Finance owns the costs, the calendar and the filing, but not the eligibility decision.
What are the three patterns of step that countries put before the claim?
No step, as in the United States, Canada and Singapore, although Canada offers optional pre-claim approval. Notification for companies claiming for the first time or after a gap, as in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Registration or approval every year, as in Australia and New Zealand. Where a step is required, missing it can mean no claim for that year.
A reviewer asks for the records behind the largest project. What three things are they most likely to test?
Whether the technical narrative is consistent with the financial records, how the staff time allocations were made and what supports them, and whether the records were made at the time the work was done. The owner named before filing answers factually, within the deadline set, and does not create new documents to fill gaps.
Why should the decision to exclude a project be written down as carefully as the decision to include one?
A written exclusion shows the tax authority that the company applied the definition rather than claiming everything, which supports the credibility of the projects that remain. It also saves the same debate next year and gives the board evidence that the claim was governed.

Official sources

Register interest in R&D Tax Fundamentals

Tell us where you claim and we will let you know when this program opens for your country.

Register interest

Educational content only, not tax advice. See the disclaimer.